FusionPapers
図版検索AI要約wiki日本の研究装置ジャーナルChatGPTAbout
© 2026 FUSIONPAPERS
About法務情報
トップに戻る

Emittance growth from merging arrays of round beamlets

O.A. Anderson1996年Fusion Engineering and DesignIF 1.7出版社

AbstractThe cost of an induction linac for heavy ion fusion (HIF) may be reduced if the number of channels in the main accelerator is reduced. There have been proposals to do this by merging beamlets (perhaps in groups of four) after a suitable degree of preacceleration. This process, which results in r.m.s. emittance growth, occurs in two stages.The first stage occurs instantly when the beamlets, no longer separated by electrodes, enter the merging region. At this point one has a collection of beamlets whose centers are displaced from the central axis by distances δxi, δyi. The mean square emittance, now calculated for the whole collection, is ϵxi2 = ϵx12 + 〈δx2〉Vx2 and similarly for the y direction. Here ϵx1 is the emittance of one undisplaced beamlet, Vx is the r.m.s. thermal velocity and ϵxi is the initial emittance of the composite beam. This first stage of emittance growth is easy to calculate and has obvious scaling properties.The second stage of merged beam emittance growth mostly occurs in about one-quarter of a plasma period, although the full development may take much longer. In this stage, space charge forces cause transverse accelerations. The maximum increase in mean square emittance is proportional to the excess electrostatic energy (free energy) in the array when the merging begins. It tends to dominate the first stage for strongly depressed initial tunes. The relatively complex calculations involving the second stage are the main concern of this paper.In some designs it may be desirable to reduce the emittance growth below that produced by a basic 2 × 2 array. For this a general understanding of the free energy is helpful. Therefore we investigate three factors affecting the normalized free energy Un of an array of charged interacting beamlets: (1) the number of beamlets N in the array; (2) the ratio η of beamlet diameter to beamlet center spacing; (3) the shape of the array. For circular arrays we obtain an analytic expression for Un n as a function of N and η. If η is held constant, it shows that Un ∼ N−1 in the large-N limit, i.e. Un would become arbitrarily small in this idealized case. We show that this is not true for square or rectangular arrays, which have larger free energy with a lower limit determined by the non-circular format. Free energy in square arrays can be reduced by omitting corner beamlets; in the case of a 5 x 5 array the reduction factor is as large as 3.3.

この論文にはまだAI要約がありません。

関連論文

Phase-space characterization of negative ion beams for fusion

2025Nuclear Fusion

Matching strategies for a plasma booster

2016Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion

Parametric analysis of electron beam quality in laser wakefield acceleration based on the truncated ionization injection mechanism

2024Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion

Non-invasive characterisation of a laser-driven positron beam

2020Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion

Beam emittance measurements of transformer coupled plasma ion source for focused ion beam

2004Review of Scientific Instruments

Space-charge-neutralized ion induction linacs with cusp insulation

1996Fusion Engineering and Design

Transverse combining of four beams in MBE-4

1996Fusion Engineering and Design

Physics design of the HNB accelerator for ITER

2015Nuclear Fusion

Parametric emittance measurements of electron beams produced by a laser plasma accelerator

2018Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion

Physics of intense charged-particle beams for heavy-ion inertial fusion

1996Fusion Engineering and Design