Electrostatic flux-driven turbulence simulations with the Hermes-3 code are performed in TCV L-mode conditions in forward and reversed toroidal field configurations, and compared to the TCV-X21 reference dataset (Oliveira et al 2022 Nucl. Fusion62 096001) qualitatively and with a quantitative methodology. Using only the magnetic equilibrium, total power across the separatrix (120 kW) and total particle flux to the targets ( s−1) as inputs, the simulations produce time-averaged plasma profiles in good agreement with experiment. Shifts in the target peak location when the toroidal field direction is reversed are reproduced in simulation, including the experimentally observed splitting of the outer strike point into two density peaks. The overall normalized discrepancy between simulation and observation is better than any previously reported in the reversed field configuration, and matches the best previously reported in forward field configuration. Differences between simulation and experiment include density profiles inside the separatrix and at the inner target in forward (favorable ) field configuration. These differences in target temperature in forward field configuration lead to differences in the balance of current to the inner and outer divertor in the private flux region. The cause of these differences is most likely the lack of neutral gas in these simulations, indicating that even in low recycling regimes neutral gas plays an important role in determining edge plasma profiles. These conclusions are consistent with findings in Oliveira et al (2022 https://github.com/SPCData/TCV-X21).