FusionPapers
図版検索トレンドwiki日本の研究
© 2026 FUSIONPAPERS
About法務情報
トップに戻る

Toroidal modeling of plasma response to high-field side RMP in HL-2A

Y H Z Liu, N Zhang, Y Q Liu, G Z Hao, J M Yu, C Y Li, G Q Dong, Q H Huang, X Y Gong2025年9月Plasma Physics and Controlled FusionIF 2.2出版社

Application of resonant magnetic perturbation (RMP) is a reasonably mature technique for controlling edge-localized mode (ELM) in high-confinement mode tokamak plasmas. The high-field side (HFS) RMP coils were recently installed in the HL-2A tokamak. This study systematically models the plasma response to the ( is toroidal mode number) HFS RMP, utilizing the single-fluid magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) code MARS-F and the MHD-kinetic hybrid code MARS-K. The results show that the HFS coil is capable of triggering the edge-peeling response which facilitates ELM control. The 60-degree phase shift for the coil current between the upper and lower rows of the RMP coils presents the optimal coil phasing. On the other hand, the HFS response field is found to be relatively weak compared to the low-field side (LFS) counterpart, assuming the same coil current level. This implies that the HFS coils are less effective for ELM control than the conventional LFS coil-design. On the positive side, the HFS RMP is found to produce smaller toroidal torques, including the Maxwell and Reynolds stress torques as well as the neoclassical toroidal viscosity torque, resulting in less side effects on the plasma as compared to the LFS counterpart. The -window for accessing ELM control by the HFS RMP is found to be approximately consistent with that by the LFS RMP.

日本語訳

共鳴磁場摂動(RMP)の適用は、高閉じ込めモードのトカマクプラズマにおける周辺局在モード(ELM)を制御するための、かなり成熟した技術である。高磁場側(HFS)RMPコイルが最近HL-2Aトカマクに設置された。この研究では、単流体磁気流体力学(MHD)コードMARS-FおよびMHD-運動論的ハイブリッドコードMARS-Kを用いて、( はトロイダルモード数) HFS RMPに対するプラズマ応答を系統的にモデル化する。結果は、HFSコイルがELM制御を促進するエッジピーリング応答を引き起こすことができることを示している。RMPコイルの上列と下列の間の コイル電流に対する60度の位相シフトが、最適なコイル位相を示す。一方、同じコイル電流レベルを仮定すると、HFS応答磁場は低磁場側(LFS)のそれと比較して比較的弱いことが見出された。これは、HFSコイルが従来のLFSコイル設計よりもELM制御に効果が低いことを示唆する。肯定的な面として、HFS RMPは、マクスウェル応力トルクおよびレイノルズ応力トルク、ならびに新古典トロイダル粘性トルクを含む、より小さいトロイダルトルクを生成することが見出され、LFSのそれと比較してプラズマへの副作用が少ない。HFS RMPによるELM制御へのアクセスのための -ウィンドウは、LFS RMPによるそれとほぼ一致することが見出された。

wiki

Resonant magnetic perturbationHL-2A

AIによる論文要約

高磁場側RMPに対するHL-2A プラズマ応答のトロイダルモデリング
JAこの論文は、トカマクにおけるRMPを用いたELM制御に関心のある核融合研究者や学生に役立つと考えられます。#HL2A #RMP #ELMcontrol #toroidalmodeling
LLM向け: {'Title': 'Toroidal modeling of plasma response to high-field side RMP in HL-2A'…

この研究では、HL-2Aトカマクに最近設置された高磁場側(HFS)RMPコイルによるプラズマ応答を系統的にモデル化しています。結果として、HFSコイルはエッジ剥離モード(ELM)制御に有効な端部剥離応答を引き起こすことが分かりました。一方で、LFSコイルと比べてHFSの応答磁場は相対的に弱いことも明らかになりました。しかし、HFSのRMPはプラズマへの副作用が小さいことも示されています。

Toroidal modeling of plasma response to high-field side RMP in HL-2A
ENThis paper is targeted at fusion researchers and engineers working on ELM control using RMP in tokamaks. It provides valuable insights into the plasma response to HFS RMP, which can help optimize ELM control strategies.#RMP #ELMcontrol #tokamak #HL2A #plasmaphysics
LLM向け: {'Title': 'Toroidal modeling of plasma response to high-field side RMP in HL-2A'…

This study models the plasma response to high-field side (HFS) resonant magnetic perturbation (RMP) in the HL-2A tokamak. It shows that HFS RMP can trigger edge-peeling response for ELM control, but is less effective than low-field side (LFS) RMP. However, HFS RMP produces smaller toroidal torques, resulting in less side effects on the plasma.

Toroidal modeling of plasma response to high-field side RMP in HL-2A
ENThis paper is useful for fusion researchers and engineers working on ELM control using RMP in tokamaks. It provides insights into the advantages and limitations of HFS RMP compared to the conventional LFS approach.#ELMcontrol #RMP #tokamak #HL2A #plasmaphysics
LLM向け: {'Title': 'Toroidal modeling of plasma response to high-field side RMP in HL-2A'…

This study models the plasma response to high-field side (HFS) resonant magnetic perturbation (RMP) in the HL-2A tokamak. The results show that HFS RMP can trigger edge-peeling response for ELM control, but it is less effective than low-field side (LFS) RMP. However, HFS RMP produces smaller toroidal torques, reducing side effects on the plasma.

関連論文

Nonlinear two-fluid modeling of plasma response to RMPs for the ELM control in the ITER baseline

2021Nuclear Fusion

A new type of resonant magnetic perturbation for controlling edge localized modes

2024Nuclear Fusion

Quasi-linear toroidal simulations of resonant magnetic perturbations in eight ITER H-mode scenarios

2022Nuclear Fusion

Modelling of plasma response to 3D external magnetic field perturbations in EAST

2016Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion

Toroidal modelling of RMP response in ASDEX Upgrade: coil phase scan, q95 dependence, and toroidal torques

2016Nuclear Fusion

Toroidal modeling of plasma response to RMP fields for HL-2M

2021Nuclear Fusion

Modeling 3D plasma boundary corrugation and tailoring toroidal torque profiles with resonant magnetic perturbation fields in ITER

2019Nuclear Fusion

Toroidal plasma response based ELM control coil design for EU DEMO

2018Nuclear Fusion

Plasma response based RMP coil geometry optimization for an ITER plasma

2016Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion

Toroidal modeling of plasma response to RMP fields in ITER

2017Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion