Plasma response to 3D resonant magnetic perturbations (RMPs), applied for the purpose of controlling type-I edge localized modes (ELMs) in ITER with the baseline ELM control coils, is computed using a toroidal, resistive, full magneto-hydrodynamic model. Considered are five representative ITER plasmas, designed for different phases of the ITER exploration. The plasma response, measured by the plasma boundary corrugation, is found to be similar for the two DT scenarios at full plasma current (15 MA) and full toroidal field (5.3 T) but different fusion gain factors (Q = 5 versus Q = 10), indicating similar ELM control performance with the same RMP coil current configuration. The other plasma scenarios, with proportionally scaled down plasma current and toroidal field, can have different plasma boundary corrugation. The key plasma parameter affecting the response is the plasma toroidal flow near the pedestal region, which significantly varies depending on the transport model assumption for the toroidal momentum. Lower pedestal flow leads to a stronger edge peeling response from the plasma and thus probably a better ELM control. The optimal coil configuration for controlling type-I ELMs is similar for all four ITER plasmas with similar safety factor but different current levels, but is significantly different for the case at half plasma current (7.5 MA) and full field (5.3 T). On the other hand, for the purpose of controlling the radial profile of the plasma toroidal rotation in ITER using 3D fields, the relative amplitude of the toroidal torque density, between the plasma core and edge region, is optimized. Generally, a strong coupling between the core and edge torques is observed, largely due to the middle row ELM control coils. The best decoupling scheme of the core-edge torque distribution thus de-emphasizes the role of the middle row coils. Optimal coil current configurations are found for the ITER 15 MA/5.3 T Q = 10 plasma, that synergistically maximize the plasma edge-peeling response (indication for good ELM control) and the toroidal torque near the plasma edge (good for RMP field penetration through pedestal).
Modeling plasma toroidal flow profile control via NTV torque with n = 2 3D fields in MAST-U