FusionPapers
図版検索トレンドwiki日本の研究
© 2026 FUSIONPAPERS
About法務情報
トップに戻る

Comparing DINA code simulations with TCV experimental plasma equilibriumresponses

R R Khayrutdinov, J B Lister, V E Lukash, J P Wainwright2001年Plasma Physics and Controlled FusionIF 2.2出版社

The DINA nonlinear time-dependent simulation code has been validated againstan extensive set of plasma equilibrium response experiments carried out on theTCV tokamak. Limited and diverted plasmas are found to be well modelled duringthe plasma current flat top. In some simulations the application of thepoloidal field coil voltage stimulation pulse sufficiently changed the plasma equilibriumthat the vertical position feedback control loop became unstable. Thisbehaviour was also found in the experimental work, and cannot be reproducedusing linear time-independent models. A single null diverted plasma dischargewas also simulated from start-up to shut-down and the results were found toaccurately reproduce their experimental equivalents. The most significantdifference noted was the penetration time of the poloidal flux, leading to adelayed onset of sawtoothing in the DINA simulation. The complete set offrequency stimulation experiments used to measure the open-loop tokamak plasmaequilibrium response was also simulated using DINA and the results wereanalysed in an identical fashion to the experimental data. The frequencyresponse of the DINA simulations agrees with the experimental results.Comparisons with linear models are also discussed in order to identify areas of goodand only occasionally less good agreement.

日本語訳

DINA非線形時間依存シミュレーションコードは、TCVトカマクで実施された広範なプラズマ平衡応答実験に対して検証された。限定配位およびダイバータ配位のプラズマは、プラズマ電流フラットトップ期間中に良好にモデル化されることが見出された。いくつかのシミュレーションでは、ポロイダル磁場コイル電圧パルスの印加がプラズマ平衡を十分に変化させ、垂直位置フィードバック制御ループが不安定となった。この挙動は実験でも確認され、線形時間非依存モデルでは再現できないことが明らかとなった。単一ヌルダイバータ配位のプラズマ放電も立ち上げから停止までシミュレーションされ、その結果は実験値と正確に一致することが示された。最も顕著な差異はポロイダル磁束の浸透時間であり、DINAシミュレーションにおけるサグトロン振動の開始遅延をもたらした。開ループトカマクプラズマ平衡応答を測定するための全周波数掃引実験もDINAを用いてシミュレーションされ、その結果は実験データと同一の方法で解析された。DINAシミュレーションの周波数応答は実験結果と一致する。線形モデルとの比較も行われ、一致が良好な領域と、やや一致が劣る領域を特定するために考察が加えられた。

wiki

TCVPlasma equilibrium
この論文にはまだAI要約がありません。

関連論文

The separatrix response of diverted TCV plasmas compared with the predictions of the CREATE-L model

1998Nuclear Fusion

Full tokamak discharge simulation of ITER by combining DINA-CH and CRONOS

2009Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion

Comparing TCV experimental VDE responses with DINA code simulations

2002Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion

Measurement of the open loop plasma equilibrium response in TCV

1999Nuclear Fusion

Plasma equilibrium response modelling and validation on JT-60U

2002Nuclear Fusion

Simulations of tokamak edge plasma turbulent fluctuations based on a minimal 3D model

2024Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion

Linear evolution of plasma equilibrium in tokamaks

2002Nuclear Fusion

A point plasma model for linear plasma devices based on SOLPS-ITER equations: application to helium plasma

2021Nuclear Fusion

Simulation of profile evolution from ramp-up to ramp-down and optimization of tokamak plasma termination with the RAPTOR code

2017Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion

Effects of non-rigidity on fast plasma boundary control using in-vessel coils in JT-60SA

2025Nuclear Fusion