AbstractThe recently developed FENDL-1 database, both in multigroup form (FENDL/MG-1.0) and continuous energy form (FENDL/MC-1.0) has been tested through analyzing a fusion integral experiment performed at the FNS facility, Japan, on a large bulk shielding assembly made of multilayers of SS316 and water. The assembly is a replica that simulates ITER shielding blanket and is bombarded by a 14 MeV source placed at 30 cm from the cylindrical assembly and housed inside a SS316 cylindrical can. This activity is undertaken as part of co-operation with JAERI on executing the required neutronics R&D tasks for ITER shield design. The objectives are (a) benchmarking FENDL-1 data and identifying any flaws that may exist in this newly developed database, and (b) examining the range of discrepancy between the calculated nuclear parameters inside the assembly and the measured ones in terms of the ratio of the calculated-to-experimental (C/E) data. Both differential and integral experimental data were analyzed along the central axis of the ∼ 120 cm D × 140 cm L assembly. The analyses with the multigroup data, MG also included library derived from ENDF/B-VI data base for comparison purposes. The MCNP Monte Carlo (MC) code was used with the FENDL/MC-1 data. The largest range of discrepancy between calculated and measured responses (reaction rates, neutron spectra, gamma ray heating, etc.) was found to be ∼ 20–30% even though in most cases this discrepancy falls within the experimental errors.
Nuclear heating measurements for SS-316, copper, graphite, tungsten, chromium, beryllium in a copper centered assembly bombarded with 14 MeV neutrons and analysis