FusionPapers
図版検索AI要約wiki日本の研究装置ジャーナルChatGPTAbout
© 2026 FUSIONPAPERS
About法務情報
トップに戻る

Inertial fusion reactors using Compact Fusion Advanced Rankine (CFARII) MHD conversion

B. Grant Logan1993年Fusion Engineering and DesignIF 1.7出版社

AbstractThis study evaluates the potential performance (efficiency and cost) of inertial fusion reactors assumed capable of vaporizing blankets of various working materials to a temperature (10,000-20,000 K) suitable for economical MHD conversion in a Compact Fusion Advanced Rankine II (CFARII) power cycle. Using a conservative model, 1-D neutronics calculations of the fraction of fusion yield captured as a function of the blanket thickness of Flibe, lithium and lead—lithium blankets are used to determine the optimum blanket thicknesses for each material to minimize CoE for various assumed fusion yields, “generic” driver costs, and target gains. Lithium-hydride blankets are also evaluated using an extended neutronics model. Generally optimistic (“advanced”) combinations of lower driver cost/joule and higher target gain are assumed to allow high enough fusion yields to vaporize and ionize target blankets thick enough to stop most 14 MeV neutrons, and to breed tritium. A novel magnetized, prestressed reactor chamber concept is modeled together with previously developed models for the CFARII Balance-of-Plant (BoP), consisting of a supersonic plasma jet, MHD generator, and “raindrop” condensor. High fusion yields (20 to 80 GJ) are found necessary to heat and ionize the Flibe, lithium, and lead-lithium blankets for MHD conversion, with initial solid thicknesses sufficient to capture most of the fusion yield. Much smaller fusion yields (1 to 20 GJ) are required for lithium-hydride blankets. For Flibe, lithium, and lead—lithium blankets, improvements in target gain and/or driver cost/joule, characterized by a “Bang per Buck” figure-of-merit of ≥ 20 joules yield per driver $, would be required for competitive CoE, while a figure-of-merit of ≥ 1 joule yield per driver $ would suffice for lithium-hydride blankets. Advances in targets/driver costs would benefit any IFE reactor, but the very low CFARII BoP costs (contributing only 3 mills/kWh to CoE) allows this type of reactor, given sufficient advances that non-driver costs dominate, to ultimately produce electricity at a much lower cost than any current nuclear plant.

wiki

MagnetohydrodynamicsInertial confinement fusion
この論文にはまだAI要約がありません。

関連論文

Nuclear design analyses of the helium cooled lithium lead blanket for a fusion power demonstration reactor

2010Fusion Engineering and Design

Tritium control modelling for a helium cooled lithium–lead blanket of a fusion power reactor

2006Fusion Engineering and Design

Breeding blanket design and systems integration for a helium-cooled lithium–lead fusion power plant

2006Fusion Engineering and Design

A conceptual design study of a reversed field pinch fusion reactor

1989Fusion Engineering and Design

Core size effects of laser fusion subcritical research reactor for fusion engineering research

2021Nuclear Fusion

Deuterium/helium-3 fusion reactors with lithium seeding

2009Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion

A 14 MeV fusion neutron source for material and blanket development and fission fuel production

2013Nuclear Fusion

Equivalent determination of tritium production in liquid blanket of fusion reactor using lithium isotopic abundance analysis

2016Fusion Engineering and Design

A helium-cooled blanket design of the low aspect ratio reactor

2000Fusion Engineering and Design

Economic, safety and environmental prospects of fusion reactors

1990Nuclear Fusion