FusionPapers
図版検索トレンドwiki日本の研究
© 2026 FUSIONPAPERS
About法務情報
トップに戻る

Comparison of the core flow approximation and full solution approach for MHD flow in non-symmetric and multiple adjacent ducts

K.A. McCarthy, A.Y. Ying, N.B. Morley, M.A. Abdou1991年Fusion Engineering and DesignIF 1.7出版社

AbstractThe core flow approximation method has been used extensively in the past several years to model MHD flow at high Hartmann number and interaction parameter. This method assumes that inertial and viscous forces and the induced magnetic field are negligible, thus transforming the governing equations to a set of linear equations. The resulting equations are much easier to solve than the original set of equations, and as a result this method has been applied to several geometries. Benchmarking to experimental results has been done with excellent results for a limited number of geometries, but more investigation is necessary to determine the validity and applicability of the core flow approach. In this paper, results of the core flow analysis are compared with results from a two-dimensional full solution analysis (which included inertial and viscous terms) to further evaluate the core flow method. In particular, comparison is made for a rectangular duct geometry with an oblique magnetic field, a rectangular duct with a magnetic field parallel to one set of walls but without symmetry about the plane between the two side walls, and multiple adjacent rectangular ducts where the magnetic field is parallel to one set of walls. Special attention is paid to assumptions used in the core flow approximation dealing with the electric current flowing in the side layers. These comparisons are done for fully developed flow, and the results show that the core flow approximation can predict flow in these geometries with accuracy that is within design limits.

日本語訳

コアフロー近似法は、過去数年にわたり、高いハルトマン数および干渉パラメータにおけるMHD流れをモデル化するために広く用いられてきた。この方法は、慣性力と粘性力、および誘起磁場が無視できると仮定し、それによって支配方程式を一連の線形方程式に変換する。結果として得られる方程式は元の方程式系よりもはるかに解きやすいため、この方法はいくつかの幾何形状に適用されてきた。限られた数の幾何形状については実験結果とのベンチマーキングが優れた結果とともに行われているが、コアフローアプローチの妥当性と適用可能性を判断するにはさらなる調査が必要である。本論文では、コアフロー解析の結果を、二次元完全解解析(慣性項と粘性項を含む)の結果と比較し、コアフロー法をさらに評価する。特に、斜め磁場を有する矩形ダクト形状、一組の壁に平行な磁場を有するが両側壁間の平面に関して対称性を持たない矩形ダクト、および一組の壁に平行な磁場を有する複数の隣接する矩形ダクトについて比較を行う。側壁層内を流れる電流に関するコアフロー近似の仮定に特に注意が払われる。これらの比較は完全に発達した流れに対して行われ、その結果、コアフロー近似はこれらの幾何形状における流れを設計限界内の精度で予測できることが示されている。

wiki

MagnetohydrodynamicsMHD flow
この論文にはまだAI要約がありません。

関連論文

Analysis of liquid metal mhd flow using an iterative method to solve the core flow equations

1989Fusion Engineering and Design

Examination of mhd fluid flow in geometric elements of a fusion reactor blanket using the core flow approach

1989Fusion Engineering and Design

Computer code for analyzing liquid metal mhd flow in rectangular duct under strong transverse magnetic field

1989Fusion Engineering and Design

Analysis of liquid metal MHD flow in multiple adjacent ducts using an iterative method to solve the core flow equations

1990Fusion Engineering and Design

MHD flow in rectangular ducts with inclined non-uniform transverse magnetic field

1995Fusion Engineering and Design

Development of a computational method for the full solution of mhd flow in fusion blankets

1989Fusion Engineering and Design

Mhd thermal hydraulic analysis of three-dimensional liquid-metal flows in fusion blanket ducts

1989Fusion Engineering and Design

Investigation of MHD flow balancing in electrically conductive manifolds of liquid metal blankets

2024Nuclear Fusion

Numerical study of liquid metal film flows in a varying spanwise magnetic field

2002Fusion Engineering and Design

3D MHD free surface fluid flow simulation based on magnetic-field induction equations

2002Fusion Engineering and Design