FusionPapers
図版検索トレンドwiki日本の研究
© 2026 FUSIONPAPERS
About法務情報
トップに戻る

Characterization of the density profile collapse of type I ELMs in ASDEX Upgrade with high temporal and spatial resolution reflectometry

I. Nunes, G.D. Conway, A. Loarte, M. Manso, F. Serra, W. Suttrop, the CFN, ASDEX Upgrade teams2004年被引用 39Nuclear FusionIF 3出版社

This paper characterizes the density profile dynamics during edge localized modes (ELMs), using high temporal and spatial resolution reflectometry, with main emphasis on the dynamics of type I ELMs. Qualitatively, the density profile dynamics of both type I and type III ELM ASDEX Upgrade tokamak discharges shows the same characteristic behaviour. The analysis of the behaviour of the density at the plasma edge allows the identification of three phases of the ELM event: precursor, collapse and recovery phases. For the three phases, the effect of ELMs is analysed both on the high-field side (HFS) and the low-field side (LFS) of the plasma at the ASDEX Upgrade. Asymmetries of the ELM event when comparing the HFS and LFS are found. The ELM event is associated with a sudden loss of particles from the main plasma (inside the last closed flux surface) to the scrape-off layer and then to the divertor. For type I ELMs the relative particle losses (to the pedestal particle content), assuming poloidal symmetry, was found to be of ∼10% using LFS measurements and of ∼5% using the HFS measurements. The type I ELM affected depths are about ∼25% and ∼15% of the plasma minor radius for the LFS and HFS profiles mapped to the outer midplane, respectively.

日本語訳

本論文は、高時間分解能・高空間分解能の反射測定を用いたエッジ局在モード(ELM)中の密度分布ダイナミクスの特性評価について述べるものであり、特にタイプI ELMのダイナミクスに重点を置いている。定性的には、ASDEX UpgradeトカマクにおけるタイプIおよびタイプIII ELMの両方の密度分布ダイナミクスは、同じ特徴的な挙動を示す。プラズマ端部における密度の挙動の解析により、ELMイベントの3つの位相、すなわち前駆体位相、崩壊位相、回復位相を特定することができる。これら3つの位相について、ASDEX Upgradeのプラズマの高磁場側(HFS)と低磁場側(LFS)の両方でELMの影響が解析されている。HFSとLFSを比較した場合、ELMイベントの非対称性が見出された。ELMイベントは、主プラズマ(最終閉鎖磁気面の内側)からスクレイプオフ層を経てダイバータへの粒子の急激な損失を伴う。タイプI ELMの場合、ポロイダル対称性を仮定した相対粒子損失量(ペデスタル粒子量に対する)は、LFS測定を用いると約10%、HFS測定を用いると約5%であることが見出された。タイプI ELMの影響を受ける深さは、外側中平面に写像されたLFSおよびHFS分布に対して、それぞれプラズマ小半径の約25%および約15%である。

装置

asdex-upgrade高精度(タイトル一致)

wiki

ASDEXEdge localized modeASDEX UpgradeDensity profilesReflectometry
この論文にはまだAI要約がありません。

関連論文

High temporal and spatial resolution reflectometry investigations of type-I ELMs induced edge barrier collapse at ASDEX Upgrade

2008Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion

High resolution density pedestal measurements during edge localized modes by short-pulse reflectometry in the TCV tokamak

2021Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion

Confinement and ELM characteristics of H-mode plasmas in KSTAR

2012Nuclear Fusion

H-mode studies with microwave reflectometry on ASDEX Upgrade

1998Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion

Impact of Te and ne on edge current density profiles in ELM mitigated regimes on ASDEX Upgrade

2015Nuclear Fusion

Inter-ELM behaviour of the electron density and temperature pedestal in ASDEX Upgrade

2010Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion

Introduction to the ELMs special issue

2003Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion

Features of spontaneous and pellet-induced ELMs on the HL-2A tokamak

2012Nuclear Fusion

Edge localized modes: recent experimental findings and related issues

2007Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion

Characteristics and scaling of energy and particle losses during Type I ELMs in JET H-modes

2002Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion